top of page

“In 1946 George Woods booked his second sitting with Leslie Flint.

A voice came through claiming to be a man called Michael Fearon,

who said he had been a biology master at Taunton School just before the war.

He said he was killed in Normandy in 1944, two weeks after D-Day. This was easy to check.

Woods even tracked down Fearon's mother and took her with him to see Flint.

The same voice came through again and Mrs Fearon agreed that it was indeed her son...”

                          Edited extract taken from the book 'Life After Death' by Neville Randall

Michael Fearon communicates

Recorded: 1954

 

“Until we rid ourselves
of the shackles of the Church,

there can be no spiritual progress for humanity.”

Michael Rodney Fearon was an officer in the British Army.

He died on June 24th 1944 aged twenty-seven.

 

His mother, Mrs Alice Fearon, visited Leslie Flint many times

at regular Friday intervals, where the two were reunited

and were able to discuss personal and philosophical matters.

 

Although Michael communicated many times,

this is the only surviving recording of the two speaking together.

 

Betty Greene makes a brief introduction.

Note: Although this 60 year old recording has been enhanced, the first three minutes are the least clear.

Note: Although this 60 year old recording has been enhanced, the first three minutes are the least clear.

Present: Leslie Flint, George Woods, Alice Fearon

Communicators: Mickey, Michael Fearon

Betty Greene:

'The next recording is that of Michael Fearon. Michael was a young officer in the last war and he was killed a fortnight after D-Day. After his death his mother used to go regularly to the medium, when Michael came through to her and they had long talks together. On this particular occasion Mr Woods went with Mrs Fearon. Mrs Fearon also confirmed that it was Michael’s voice when we both appeared on the television programme.'

 

Mickey:

Hello…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Oh, hello Mickey.

 

Mickey:

Well, how are you - and Woodsie?

 

Mrs Fearon:

Very well thank you.

 

Mickey:

I didn’t know you was coming Mrs Fearon.

 

Mrs Fearon:

What you say? You didn’t know he was coming?

 

Mickey:

No. I knew you was due to come, but I didn’t know that Mr Woods was coming. Anyway, I’m always pleased to see Woody.

 

Woods:

It’s very nice to hear your voice again…

 

Mickey:

One of my best pals, aren’t you Mr Woods?

 

Woods:

Yes.

 

Mickey:

Oh well. Let’s give Mike a chance…

Mrs Fearon:

Been a terrible time since I was last here.

 

Mickey:

Well it must be what - two months?

 

Mrs Fearon:

Easily I should think.

 

Mickey:

Well I suppose it must be, ‘cause time’s difficult to gauge. But I should have thought it was around that time.

So how’s the world with you Mr Woods?

 

Woods:

Oh very well Mickey. Very well indeed. Nothing is wrong at all.

 

Mickey:

Well I suppose there’s plenty worse off than you, ain’t there mate?

 

Woods:

Oh yes. I always think about other people who are very much worse off than I am.

 

Mickey:

I suppose most people have something to moan about, but then we can always find someone worse off.

 

Woods:

Yes, everyone has trouble about something….

 

Mickey:

Course, I know people who never stop grumbling.

 

Woods:

It’s a habit with some people.

 

Mickey:

Well, most things can become a habit if you let ‘em.

 

Woods:

Well yes, I think it can.

 

[Long pause]

Flint:

[Yawning] Mickey’s gone to find Mike.

 

Woods & Mrs Fearon talking:

[unintelligible]

 

Michael:

Hello mother.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Hello darling. Seems donkey’s years since we spoke, doesn’t it?

 

Michael:

Yes, I suppose it does really.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I’ve had a terrible time Mike…

 

Michael:

But I’ve been so constantly with you. I mean I come pretty well every day that…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Oh I can feel you around.

 

Michael:

…I never really feel out of touch. Probably you feel out of touch, in as much that you don’t have the opportunity to speak to me very often. But, I never feel out of touch because…

 

Mrs Fearon:

It’s nicer to speak aloud, isn’t it Mike?

 

Michael:

Oh well it’s much more satisfactory obviously. I mean I love coming to talk to you, it’s a wonderful opportunity. It means so much to me - as indeed it does to everybody who has the opportunity to come through and speak to those they love on Earth.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I know…

 

Michael:

It could make such a vast difference to people if they understood this and realised that death isn’t what they think it is. It isn’t [the severing of contact between us].

 

Mrs Fearon:

There is no death….

 

Michael:

It’s only an illusion.

Mrs Fearon:

Mmm…

 

Michael:

Man has created death in his own mind. It doesn’t really exist, only in his own mind…

 

Mrs Fearon:

I wonder why that is?

 

Michael:

Well I suppose it’s because they were so materialistic, in as much that they lived completely and wholly and solely for materialism. But when someone that they’ve known and loved leaves them, as they think, that is in the physical sense, then as far as they’re concerned that’s the end of it. Of course there have always been people who believed in something after death, but never quite understood what it was, or where it was…

 

Mrs Fearon:

No, they believed in the resurrection and…

 

Michael:

Well the point is that man has always, sort of, looked upon their life as something purely materialistic. But when they started creating, in their own minds, an idea of a new life or a new heaven or new existence, call it what you will - they assumed that it would be in a physical body. They could never, sort of, even then get away from the old materialistic conception.

 

Even today, I mean, after all’s said and done, untold thousands of people who believe in the life after death, their conception of it is extraordinarily materialistic. And many, many people, who I suppose the world calls religious or in some senses, good anyway, because they conform to certain creeds or dogmas and so on, they think that they’re coming back upon the Earth in a material form on the great day, as it were. Really, when you come to think about it, things that some people believe are quite fantastic.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Absolutely.

 

Michael:

And yet it’s all man-made. There’s not a scrap of evidence to support their theories. And yet the Church, taking it as a whole, does still preach this ridiculous idea of heaven and hell. Heaven if you’ve been awfully good and you’ve followed certain tenets and so on - and hell if you haven’t, sort of, followed what they think as right. Really, when one comes to analyse it, it doesn’t hold water at all.

 

Mrs Fearon:

No. Mike I…

 

Michael:

Actually, I always feel that man has limited himself by his own attitude and outlook.

Mrs Fearon:

Well it isn’t only in religion he limits himself is it?

 

Michael:

No, not only in that exactly. The point is, that man limits God to a great extent by his own limitation. I mean, once man can rid himself of materialism, as regards the things that appertain to the things of the spirit - which may sound perhaps a little bit complicated - but, it’s extraordinary how man even assumes that spiritual things have a materialistic basis.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Well they can’t get away from their materialism can they?

 

Michael:

No, the point is, that they can only think and see and understand something that is physically tangible to them. When a thing gets beyond that, they can’t grasp it at all.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Last time I was here you said, for heaven’s sake whoever you bring, don’t bring any parsons.

 

Michael:

Well I don’t want to sound prejudice, but I’m afraid I haven’t got very much time for the Church or for so many who adhere to it. Because their minds are so narrowed, unbelievably narrowed, that they cannot get beyond a certain point. They can only accept that which falls in a certain degree, within their own experience or their own belief. They are so limited by their own knowledge, if you can call it knowledge.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes. Want of knowledge…

 

Michael:

Yes, well probably that would be more true to say, but I give them the benefit of the doubt. The point is, they have so, as it were, tried to…

 

Mrs Fearon:

…to things.

 

Michael:

Yes. Well, I mean, the whole point is that they’ve put it all in a little nutshell, if you can put it like that. Then they think they’ve got all knowledge which is contained in a nutshell. Whereas actually of course it’s…knowledge is something so vast, so tremendous that even the most highly evolved can only grasp a small percentage of it.

 

But they seem to think that what is contained, shall we say, in the Bible from cover to cover, is all there is to know they can’t expect anything beyond that. And even then, although they say that they accept all that they read in the Bible, very few people, if they’re honest, do.

Mrs Fearon:

Then they don’t interpret it right do they?

 

Michael:

Well the whole point is, that the Bible…well obviously, there is much truth, there is much goodness in the Bible. I mean in the simple teachings of Jesus, if one were to follow in the example that he set, then man could not go far wrong in his material life, in the things that he did. And his outlook and his spiritual development would, in consequence, would be great. But the point is, that they try to narrow things down to such a degree, they try to make out of the simple truths of Jesus so much that is complex and involved.

 

They tried to tack on so much over the centuries that has nothing whatever to do with Jesus. I mean the virgin birth, for instance, is as old as the hills. It was the basis of practically every ancient religion. That obviously crept in centuries after the passing - death of Jesus. It had no foundation in fact at all. There’s so much…

 

Mrs Fearon:

But … it’s not true.

 

Michael:

There’s so much that is mythical that they’ve tacked on and made it all so mysterious and so, sort of, difficult for the intelligent person to believe. That so many people, in consequence, obviously, over the years - as they have become more educated and more intelligent and they think more deeply for themselves - obviously just can’t accept it. And in consequence the churches have lost ground; constantly, increasingly over the years. The Church holds on to so much that has no foundation in fact.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes and they’ve built up a lot themselves haven’t they, that doesn’t bear up at all. I mean all that dogma and all that sort of thing…

 

Michael:

Well I mean what is the church service when it’s analysed? Repetition, from beginning to end. It’s been going on for years and years and years. Who can go on singing the same old hymns with the same bane old words and have any faith or belief and feeling about them?

 

Mrs Fearon:

Then you wouldn’t go to church at all.

 

Michael:

And then considerably, the peculiar manner in which, often, a clergyman gives an address. I mean their awful, toneless, humdrum, miserable voices. I mean it’s enough to drive a person out of church.

Mrs Fearon:

Yes but Mike, you must remember this, every day it’s expected of them and they are paid practically nothing.

 

Michael:

Well I would say they’re paid far more than they’re worth, but still perhaps…

 

Mrs Fearon:

No I don’t agree with you…

 

Michael:

I’m sorry Mother…

 

Mrs Fearon:

…they take an awful lot of time and do some good work for jolly little.

 

Michael:

Mother…

 

Woods:

I’ll agree with you Mike!

 

Michael:

Our point is this that I think - the point is that although there are very good people, as the world terms good anyway, in the church - that is, working in the church and serving in the church and also among it’s adherents. The point is, that what is the point in going round and round in a circle, which has no beginning and no end, where you just don’t achieve anything?

 

I mean, I’m prejudice against the Church for various very good reasons - and when I say this I speak for untold millions of people here. The Church has never lifted it’s finger against war.

 

Mrs Fearon:

No I quite agree with you.

 

Michael:

Now take the recent war and the war before that. What did the Church do to help stop it? Did they proclaim the simple teachings of 

Jesus, who was the ‘Prince of Peace’, and come solemnly out against war? No they didn’t.

Mrs Fearon:

No that’s where they lost their chance…

 

Michael:

What did the Pope do during the war? Did he say ‘I’ll excommunicate every Roman Catholic who takes part in war’ ? Of course he didn’t. But if he had of done that, there’s no doubt that Italy would never have come into the war. Because being such a strong Roman Catholic country they would not have dared to go against their Pope.

 

I mean, the point is that the Church preaches the ‘Prince of Peace’ and yet doesn’t follow his example…in times of need. There’s nothing more important than following the simple teachings that Jesus gave. I am all for Jesus but I am far, far removed from the Church and I am very, very proud and very happy to say it.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes…

 

Michael:

And that’s why I think this enquiry of the Church into this subject - although I know there are good people in it and sincere ones - will achieve nothing. Because the prejudice of the Church is so great and they object, deep down within them, to any other person, or group of persons, setting up anything which may take away their power.

 

 

The Church has always thrived on two things: fear and power - and take those things away and they have nothing left.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Oh well I think you’re a spot hard on them Mike.

 

Michael:

I am very hard on them. I intend to be hard on them…because until we rid ourselves of the shackles of the Church there can be no true spiritual progress for humanity. The Church has done good in certain respects, I don’t deny that. But it’s done untold harm over the centuries. Innumerable people have died terrible, tragic, untimely deaths at the hands of the Church, because people didn’t believe in their particular beliefs or particular creed or dogma.

 

The whole point is the Church has always been against human progress, it’s never, never gone forward, step by step, with humanity. It’s always stood it’s ground. Hard down, hard ground, believe me.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes well…

 

Michael:

And if you haven’t bowed your head to the Church, God help you.

Mrs Fearon:

Listen, how would you get it - this religion of Jesus - to the masses?

Where are you?

 

Michael:

Every man can find Jesus within himself, but nevertheless…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes but whether he does…

 

Michael:

…if he reads his Bible and uses wisdom and discretion, he can find the truth therein. But he has to learn to discard all the things which have been added to it - often by churchmen, over the centuries, for their own ends.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes. To me the Quakers come nearest to it than anybody.

 

Michael:

I agree with you. The Quakers, in my opinion are nearest, possibly, to real Christians.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

More than any orthodox religious body.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes, I agree.

 

Michael:

After all, they sit and wait for the Spirit to move them. They have no creed, form or ceremony. They gather together humbly to worship God and to ask his divine guidance and they wait for the Spirit to move them. Actually they are nearer Spiritualists. And when I use the term Spiritualists, I mean true Spiritualists.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

Unfortunately there aren’t very many true Spiritualists, in the real sense of the word. I know that at times I must strike you as being very, sort of, hard on the Orthodox Church…but I think its history speaks for itself. Its history is its own condemnation.

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

Michael:

I don’t come to condemn any more than anyone else. We leave it to the conscience of the individual or the group of individuals - and I think the Church’s record is pretty grim.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

Woods:

I agree with you on that Mike.

 

Michael:

I’m not the slightest bit interested in this church enquiry, because I don’t think it will get anywhere at all. Because they’ll cling to their little, narrow ideas and their creeds and their dogmas. And they’ll try and swamp this truth - which is as free as the air - with it. They’ll try and swamp this wonderful, glorious truth with their own creeds and dogmas and confine it to the Church. They’ll do more harm than good, in the long run.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes. But supposing you had got to come back to Earth. What line would you take here?

 

Michael:

In what way do you mean exactly?

 

Mrs Fearon:

Well I mean…

 

Flint:

[Sniffing]

 

Mrs Fearon:

…how would you get religion, real religion to the masses. Half of them - more than half of them - don’t read the Bible. And if they do they don’t practice it in their everyday life. How would you get it to them Mike?

 

Michael:

I know it’s…

Mrs Fearon:

It’s alright to be distracted dear.

 

Michael:

I know it’s a big problem, but I would say that one of the most important ways to get religion - and I use that in a sense - actually the word religion…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes, take your time.

 

Michael:

Put it like that then, the teachings of Christ, if one were to get the teachings of Christ to the masses, one would do - endeavour to do, shall we say, what Christ did. That is; set an example.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

Unless you set an example yourself, you cannot expect people to follow you. I mean so many Christians for instance, talk so glibly about Christ and attend their church regularly, for instance. But they are, by far, a long way from setting an example.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I quite agree.

 

Michael:

And after all, Christ did the things that he did because he understood his inner divinity and his, shall we say, oneness with God. I mean, for instance, so much that Christ did - and they were called miracles. You term them miracles because you don’t understand them. A miracle’s a miracle because you don’t understand how it’s done.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

But the point is that Christ knew, what today his followers do not know. He knew the power within himself. From within yourself comes opportunity and power to do great things. Christ was able to heal the sick. Christ was able even to raise the dead. And so many other things that ones reads about, he did. Yet does the Church do it? Do the clergymen do it?

Mrs Fearon:
They’re coming to it a bit, aren’t they?

 

Michael:

Yes, very slowly. But did it ever come from within the Church? Oh no. It came from without the Church. And now the church is beginning to realise there might be something in it and they might be, in consequence, be able to make good use of it or bring people back into the Church. But their motives are ulterior, in my opinion, not good.

 

They want to get people back into the Church, they want to make the Church powerful again. And so, they realise that, that which has been going on outside the Church - people have found truth outside the Church - they might be able to bring it into the Church. But what about those who are still outside, and because of their freedom of thought and will, have been able to make progress with this great truth.

 

It is because the people outside the Church have been free of the shackles of the Church, that they have made spiritual progress. And the churches, in consequence, have lost a great deal. But now the Church is getting frightened. It wants to drag them back and you’ll find that ‘ere long if it is brought back into the Church, to some degree, that they’ll try and strangle it and make it impossible for people to be outside the Church.

 

The Church has always wanted to strangle people outside, wanted to keep things to itself. I have no time, patience or interest in the Church.

 

Mrs Fearon:

No? It’s difficult. It’s a terribly difficult subject down here Mike. You see, you get a sort of fair view of it, you know, from above…

 

Michael:

Well I’m sorry if I sound vehement about it.

 

Mrs Fearon:

No I don’t - I’m not…

 

Michael:

But I’m not sorry in a sense, because I know that freedom of thought, freedom of expression, freedom in so many different forms, exist much more outside the Church than within it.

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

The Church wants you to go its way, in its narrow little confines. And if you accept and believe as the Church would have you believe, you are alright when you come here - which believe me is a lot of hooey !

 

We’ve got a lot of the people who had this narrow concept of life and religion, if you like to use the term, through the Church, found things vastly different when they came here. In fact, they were hampered in their progress because of the narrow beliefs that they’d got.

 

In fact, some people coming here, believing that they were really God’s elect and they were the chosen ones, still exist over here in a certain sphere, believing that they are the only person who - persons who still exist in this world. They are blind to any other form of life or advancement. They are so narrowed in their outlook, that they really and genuinely think that they are the only ones who have been ‘reborn’ as they term it - and even they are waiting to come back on Earth in a physical shape…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Are they really?

 

Michael:

…waiting for the resurrection of the body. All these false teachings that the Church has given over the centuries has done untold harm to untold millions of people and separated families and individuals. Believe me, the Church has much to answer for and I have little or no interest for it whatsoever. And all this recent probing that is going on into this truth, although I know there are sincere people in it, at the same time I feel the outcome will not be good.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Mike…

 

Michael:

While Spiritualism is free, it has chance to breathe and make progress and individuals can feel and think and accept what they can accept by their development of mind and of spirit, freely and make progress. But once it is brought into the confines of the Church, with all its rigmarole, with all its superstition, with all its nonsense, it will stifle it again.

Mrs Fearon:

Mike, when you first crossed over, what did you feel like about it? This didn’t come to you straight away did it?

 

Michael:

It didn’t come to me straight away, no. But fortunately, I wasn’t hide-bound and creed-bound and priest-bound, like so many were. I was able to think clearly and I was able to make progress, because of the freedom of my thought. And I was able to contact many souls who had made spiritual advancement and they were able to help me in so many ways, and I was able to come back to you very soon afterwards.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Yes.

 

Michael:

And I noticed that when you needed help it wasn’t the Church that gave it to you.

 

Mrs Fearon:

My dear, it’s jolly difficult to get help isn’t it? Especially in the world as it is.

 

Michael:

We come to break down the barriers that lie between men. To break down the barriers that man has created by racial intolerance and hatred, by creed and by dogma. We come down that we might, in some measure, bring all peoples together - as one family, under one God. We have a purpose and a mission.

 

We are not interested in powers and principalities. We are not interested in churches and in creeds and in dogmas. We are not interested in all the things that hold man to Earth. We are interested in the things that make them free, that make them well and happy in spirit and in mind and in body.

 

We come that we might, in some measure, make your world a better place to live in for the people that follow after you - that they be born free in their mind to live and to love and to learn and to understand the things that are of God. We have great purpose in coming Mother…

 

We are not interested in the Church, we are not interested in institutions, as such. We are interested only in individuals; collectively and individually. We come to break down all the barriers that time and man has, in his ignorance, created. We know that we can do great things. But we know that we only do it when man’s mind is freed from the shackles that bind him to the Earth.

 

And in my opinion, creed and dogma are two of the most difficult things to rid them of. And that’s one of our courses that we have to take - to break down the stronghold of the Church. And the Church’s foundation is still strong, even though it’s toppling. We know that there is no strength in the Church, because there has never been true Spirituality in it.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I agree with you Mike. I get more help from you than from anybody. You know I thought perhaps, you know, it was my fault?

Michael:

No. I know that there’s only one way to salvation, and that is by man’s own desire for goodness within himself to be made manifest upon the Earth. That man himself, within himself, has great strength - great strength of character, great strength of spirit. And that if he would look into himself and bring forth that which he finds, as Jesus did, nothing is impossible.

The Church will not do that for you. An individual must do it for himself, but we can show the way and we can give great help and aid to those who seek and strive. Once a man begins to seek and strive within himself for greater things, then we can help him greatly.

I know that there’s much that we have to do. Sometimes it seems almost impossible to us to do it, but we can and we shall do it. For that which we are doing is not only our work, it is greater than ourselves, because we are but instruments of God. We do the work of God and we do it freely, we have no axe to grind. We do it because we love humanity, because we want to prevent humanity making the mistakes it has made over many years of the past. We want the truth to shine forth and make men free.

 

Mrs Fearon:

You’ve helped me a lot.

 

Michael:

We have a great purpose in coming, believe me.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I’m sure you have. It’s a pity more people can’t hear it.

 

Woods:

[unintelligible]…Mike, what happens to the people that are so bound to creeds and dogmas when they pass to the other side. The first passing - when they arrive?

Michael:

Well, I think it’s pretty obvious. I mean, the point is, a man, immediately after death, is no different to what he was five minutes before. That is, in regard to his outlook and his character and his personality and so on. And therefore a person who has very strong religious convictions still holds them, very strongly, when he comes here. But he begins to realise that he’s rather like a ‘fish out of water’ and he begins to realise that a lot of his old ideas and teachings and creeds and so on, just don’t apply, they don’t fit. They just are not, shall we say, natural here.

 

Because the first thing he realises is, that everything here is normal, everything here is natural. People are, in themselves, very much the same as they were on Earth, but without all the heaviness, if I can use such an expression, of the material life, without all the old ideas which kept them back in their mental and spiritual progress. He begins to realise that many of the old ideas he had are purely man’s material conception of a heaven and of God.

 

He begins to realise that life here is a normal and natural thing, that all around him is great beauty - in many, many forms - and that he himself is exactly himself, as he was. But much that he held fast to and which he thought would, shall we say, make for himself a heaven because of his beliefs, he finds is not necessarily so. That many, many phases of life exist and that he himself must adjust himself to his condition in which he finds himself - and of course there are always those who will meet him; friends and relations, people he’s known and loved and who still love him.

 

And they will talk to him and endeavour to make him realise that he has to rid himself of much that he thought was true when on Earth, and make himself, as it were, mentally free, to be able to adjust himself to his new form of existence. I mean, so many people have such a hazy idea of what life is like or could be like, on this side. And those who have very orthodox, strong views - Christian, if you like - they really do believe that they are elected, as it were, for a phase of life which is far superior to any other. Which of course is not so.

 

Because man is a complex creature, in so many different ways and so many shapes and forms, and there is no person who is so good and no person who is so bad - in all there are redeeming features. And because you believe in certain tenets, doesn’t make you a better person. What makes a person better is; the things that they have done, the thoughts and the actions and the things that have helped to make that person a character or an individual.

 

Just because you believe in a certain something doesn’t save you, doesn’t make you a supreme being, doesn’t make you worthy, shall we say, to become one of God’s elect. Every man must find for himself his own path and progress and, of course, it goes through many phases and many states of existence and takes generations of time. The Earth life is merely a short phase in one’s existence and it is important that one should have to go through it and learn all that one can. But the reason that one comes into the Earth is not for what you can can take out of it, but rather what you can put into it.

 

From within yourself the spirit which is there, which can guide and can give you strength and give you the path, the illumination, as it were, is so often hidden. In fact, in 99 cases of 100 or more it’s hidden. Because man is taught, when on Earth, to develop his material powers, his brain, how to earn a living in different ways and so many things he is taught. But he is never taught the things of the spirit. You see, he may go to a Sunday school and then graduate into a church, but what does it teach him? It teaches him the most narrow of all conceptions of the spirit.

 

It doesn’t give him spiritual freedom, it doesn’t give him a path to tread that will really enlighten his path and make it one of usefulness, as I see it. Unless a religion is completely free, a belief is completely free from within oneself, where one can, sort of, expand and grow and not be held down, shackled down by creed and a dogma, which holds no weight, in time and in truth, then you see, there’s no use. Life is entirely up to the individual.

 

I know that, to a certain extent, a person’s life is affected by conditions around him, by relations and friends and business and so many things affect a man, and make it impossible sometimes for him to do the things he’d like to do. But nevertheless, man has, to a great extent, free will, in which he can do the things which are within his conscience. And every man has a conscience and the point is, that one’s conscience can be one’s guide.

 

I don’t say it can always be entirely a safe guide, because even there, consciences differ according to the individual - what is evil to one man may not necessarily be evil to another. But the point is, that there is a path that all can tread, within which, one can do so much, that will not only help oneself to progress spiritually and mentally, but to help those around and about you. As Jesus said, ‘love thy neighbour as thyself’ - how many people do that, even among so-called professing Christians?

 

The point is, there is no greatness in power, there is no greatness in even tradition - although some people would like you to have it so. The point is, that power comes from humility, from kindliness, from sympathy, from love, from sharing all that you have with others. I don’t mean by that just merely mercenary and material things. The thing which help man to grow are the things which are purely and wholly of the spirit.

 

Every man has within himself the spirit of God. To bring that out Jesus said that you should within yourself. And it is true, that within yourself you find all that you need. For as you begin to understand that you have within yourself that power of God, so you begin to grow and expand and become, as it were, more wholly of God. There are no limits that are set to man, if he will follow the right path and seek to develop the spirit within himself.

 

The Church - I know we get back to the Church with unfailing regularity - but the point is, the Church does not encourage man to develop the powers of the spirit. In fact it discourages him, because if you were to go to a church and you were to declare that you had seen this or experienced that, the first thing they’d think was that you were a little bit peculiar in the head, to say the least of it. But clergy, who should know most, know so little.

 

Their task is to heal the sick, their task is to comfort those who mourn, with knowledge, not with just platitudes and ‘well, it might be this or might be that’ and if she or he has believed in the tenets of the Church and so on, that all is well. I mean the whole point is, the Church is blind - has been blind for centuries, untold centuries. It just doesn’t express the things that are - as I see it - of God, in the complete real sense that they should. They have a little truth that they’ve swamped with so much that is of materialistic conception.

 

Life is, to a great extent, on both sides, what you yourself have made it and man is no more or no less than what he has become through his own experience. And man can be great or he can be very, very low in the scale of things. The Church could be such a leader in these things - well it isn’t, that’s the tragedy. I know I must sound - and I must admit I am - very prejudiced, because I have seen, only too well, the results of two wars.

 

Although the first one I did nothing, I’ve seen the results, in as much that I’ve met many here who passed over through the first war and, of course, many of my friends in the second war. And I know only too well that the Church could have done so much, but it did nothing, because it is only concerned with its own material power and aggrandisement.

 

And this new search into this truth which the Church is making, though there are good people in it and sincere ones, nevertheless I feel - and I know I’m right in saying - will lead nowhere. Certainly the Church will strangle it if it can, as it’s strangled everything of real advancement.

Woods:

Yes I agree with you Mike.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Mmm…

 

Michael:

Can you imagine a bishop or an archbishop standing down, shall we say, in place of a medium who has the power to bring through some great soul from this side, who would give an oration that would put the archbishop into shame? Do you think an archbishop would, for instance, demean himself, in his own estimation, to stand aside and allow an ordinary person who was not of the Church, uneducated as that may be, to stand in the pulpit and give an oration which would shame the archbishop?

 

The archbishops and all those who hold sway, are concerned more with their own personal affairs. Besides, there’s so much that one could go into which, probably there’s no point at the moment in doing. But I have little or no faith in the Church, it’s failed generations, untold generations of souls and it’ll go on failing them, until gradually it will disappear.

 

Mrs Fearon:

And then what?

 

Michael:

Then, by that time, this truth will have made such tremendous progress, that minds will be free of dogmas and creeds and man will know for himself - in various shapes and forms and ways. And also, although I have little patience in a sense, with…with science, in as much that often, the things that science brings forth are for destruction, rather than for construction - yet nevertheless, even scientists will turn more and more to this truth.

 

And from it they will be able to learn much and they will be helped and guided. And if we find - as I think we shall - the individuals whom we are seeking, we shall perfect an instrument in the years to come, which will make possible communication between our world and yours - in such a way there can be no scepticism. Which will, in itself, be such a revolutionary thing, that it will forever break down the power of the Church.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Mmm…

 

Michael:

Follow the teachings of Jesus. Follow his example. It is the greatest and the most glorious example in the whole of human history…and at the same time, do not allow the Church to make you accept its interpretation of a mythical Jesus wrapped in mystery. Jesus was humble, but the Church would make him so great that he would be unapproachable by you. Jesus did not want to set up a religion. Jesus didn’t come to form a religion. Jesus came to show the path that man might follow it. But the Church, to a great extent, has hidden that path from the eyes…and the minds…of the people.

Mrs Fearon:

Yes, I feel sure you’re right.

 

Woods:

Yes, I do.

 

Michael:

I must go.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Well dearie…

 

Michael:

I haven’t said one tenth of what I wanted to say…

 

Mrs Fearon:

Well we’ll give you another chance.

 

Michael:

…and what I have said I have not said perhaps as well as I might. And if I have sounded just a little bit, well, prejudiced I suppose, it isn’t 

really prejudice.

 

Mrs Fearon:

No.

 

Michael:

It’s only that I and untold millions of souls here who suffered, for the last few years through war - which could have been prevented - if the Church, to a certain extent, had made some attempt to play its part. Instead of praising, if they had condemned, much might been of avoided. I do not trust the Church, because it has always failed humanity in its hour of need.

 

Woods:

Mike. I’d like to ask something before you go Mike.

 

Michael:

Yes Mr Woods.

 

Woods:

We’re coming up next Monday…

 

Michael:

Yes.

 

Woods:

…at 11:00am

 

Michael:

Yes.

 

Woods:

I was wondering if you could…[unintelligible]…the things you’d like to ask him…if you would be kind enough to come through?

 

Michael:

You’d like me to come would you?

Woods:

Yes I would…

 

Michael:

Well I promise you I will come. I’ll do my utmost to be present and anything I can do to help I really will, you know.

 

Woods:

Thank you very much.

 

Michael:

Well Mummy I must go, but all my love and God bless

 

Mrs Fearon:

God bless you dear.

 

Michael:

And goodbye Mr Woods and thanks for all your…

 

Mrs Fearon:

You’re dead right. I know.

 

Michael:

Yes, but I suppose we must try to be a little bit more forbearing to the Church, but I find it very difficult, believe me. Because I know so 

much unhappiness, so much misery could have been prevented, if the Church used its strength - which it has, to a certain extent, still got - to prevent war.

 

Mrs Fearon:

I quite agree Mike.

 

Michael:

But when they bless the soldiers, when they bless the flags, when they bless the ships, when they bless the guns - and when they ask God for help in their wars - how can you respect them?

 

Mrs Fearon:

I didn’t go inside a church Michael. I couldn’t.

 

Michael:

Well I must go. Goodbye.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Goodbye and God bless you.

 

Mickey:

Goodbye!

 

Woods:

Goodbye Mickey.

 

Mickey:

Well Mike, he can’t stand churches. Bye bye!

 

Woods:

Goodbye Mickey.

 

Mrs Fearon:

Goodbye Mickey.

 

Flint:

He’s always had a very strong aversion to the Church hasn’t he?

 

Woods:

Well I can’t blame him. I have a brother-in-law who is bishop of Bury St Edmunds...

 

Flint:

Mmm…

 

Woods:

[unintelligible]

 

Mrs Fearon:

Is he the Bishop of Bury St Edmunds then?

 

Woods:

Yes.

END OF RECORDING

This transcript was created for the Trust by K. Jackson-Barnes - May 2017

bottom of page